anonymous wrote : | When you talk about queues on each node I guess you really mean *consumers*. | | E.g. "If there are remote queues and we haven't yet bound to any queue...", should be "If there are remote consumers and we haven't yet bound to any consumer..." from what i understand on how clustering works we initially route the message in BindingsImpl and only know about remote queues not what consumers are on them only that there are some. once the message is routed to that queue normal grouping will take over and pin it to a particular consumers. If I have misunderstood how this works can you explain. anonymous wrote : Secondly, your algorithm looks kind of similar to one of the Paxos variants. What's the reasoning why none of the Paxos variants are sufficient for our use case? which variant do you think is similar? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4241116#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...