"chtimi2" wrote : Are you referring to the TrCoreProgrammersGuide pdf? I think so (was probably renamed) but just to be sure. | Yes. anonymous wrote : | As i thought, the check method is passed a list of the active threads. | If i'm not mistaken, i would just need to implement a BlockingCheckedAction, that calls join() on all those threads, and use it for the global transaction. | That should work. anonymous wrote : | To sum it up: | 1/ Launch the server with -Dcom.arjuna.ats.jts.checkedTransactions=YES to enable checked transactions | Last time I checked it was on by default. anonymous wrote : | 2/ Implement BlockingCheckedAction that does: for (Thread t: list) { t.join() } | 3/ Just after the global transaction has started i would need to do | Current current = OTSManager.get_current(). | | current.setCheckedAction ( new BlockingCheckedAction() ); | | | I thought of a simple unit test to verify the correctness of the transactional behaviour. | Do you think this would work? I prefer asking before i start spending time integrating another TransactionManager in Spring. | | 1/ UnitTest (UT) calls transactional service void updateXY ( int X , int Y , boolean failOnUpdatingY ) synchronously | 2/ The global transaction is initiated and updateXY updates X | 3/ updateXY then calls transactional service updateY ( int Y , boolean failOnUpdatingY ) asynchronously | 4/ updateY executes within the same global transaction; if (failOnUpdatingY) a RuntimeException is thrown, which must rollback the global transaction | 5/ UT sleeps for a second, by then the transaction should have been committed or rolled back | 6/ UT calls getX and getY | 7/ Verifications: | Case ! failOnUpdatingY: X and Y should have their new values because the global transaction has been committed | Case failOnUpdatingY: X and Y should have their old values because the global transaction has been rolled back | Assuming you're not looking at distributed invocations here then that looks like it should work (but I haven't put a lot of time into thinking about it.) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4256661#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...