[Design of EJB 3.0] - Re: EJBTHREE-786 - jboss-dev-forums

Tuesday, 2 October 2007

anonymous wrote : Again, can't we just tell SEAM to change their method name and
disallow EJBObject methods on Remote interfaces like EJB2.1 does?

Seam is not the only application in the universe that I could imagine defining a method
named "remove".

View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090761#...

Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...