"emuckenhuber" wrote : It looks like the same is true for the common.lib folders as well. Most of the .jars would actually rather belong to a deployer or profile. | I agree with this point. For example, the EJB3 jars would make sense only for a profile which has EJB3 capabilities. Right now most of the EJB3 jars are put in common/lib. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4266564#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...