"ron.sigal(a)jboss.com" wrote : | 1. Does anyone care about having this feature? | | 2. This change would mean that the InvocationMarshaller would be used on the server side when returning a response and InvocationUnMarshaller would be used on the client side to unmarshal the response. Would adding and removing transaction context in the server-to-client direction have any implications? | | 3. Since EJB3 handles transaction information in an interceptor and doesn't, by default, configure any marshaller or unmarshaller, am I right that this issue is irrelevant to EJB3? | | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4135268#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...