"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Why the name of the method? It should be a property name. | Is this a spring thing again? :-) | Not that I would know. I think they have a interface you need to implement to get your name injected - BeanNameAware. I thought it is more flexible to have a method, not just setter - three more chars to write. ;-) And I always liked applyName. :-) "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | And do you support something like? | | | | @InjectContextName | | public void setName(Stinrg name) {} | | or | | @Inject(fromContext="name") | | public void setName(String name) {} | | Support it in what way? This should be a part of our annotation support if that's what you mean. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4063865#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...