"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : That's a novel approach - but I think there is one main problem with it as suggested: we don't want users to actually be able to change the graph structure of their existing process (more specifically, anything that we consider to be static in the process definition) - we want them to be able to change *anything else* but that (like classes, extra process files [like images] or auxiliary XML data like GPD information). | | Maybe there could be a way to provide a process patch where just classes and files are provided, and changes to the XML that are not related to graph structure. Maybe a separate schema/DTD for updates that can clearly express this requirement. could you explain why you make the difference between changing the graph structure and other changes ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4052786#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...