"ataylor" wrote : Of course if we wanted we could implement our own simple naming service using Mina. We only have to handle destinations and connection factories. This would remove the dependency! | | Would we really need that? JBM is fully functional without any need for JNDI - since connection factories and destinations can be instantiated directly on the client side. The only reason we really need JNDI is for JMS spec which mentions that JMS objects should be available in JNDI. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4150241#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...