"ron.sigal(a)jboss.com" wrote : "david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | 2bb. we would have to provide a Remoting 2 facade for Remoting 3 so that InvokeRemoteInterceptor doesn't need to know which version of Remoting is running. | | | | A "2bc." could be to go with the original plan to provide a Remoting 3 facade for Remoting 2 invocations. Then the invoker client would simply always use Remoting 3 and it use the service discovery mechanism to figure out how the request moves across the wire. | | A similar thing could be done on the server side: create an emulation service that receives invocations and forwards them to a Remoting 3 RequestHandler. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168536#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...