"bstansberry(a)jboss.com" wrote : | Biggest hassle to all this is the compile-time incompatibility between JBC releases. So, if we have different JBC adapters in the code base, the EJB3 build is going to need to be segmented to build each one separately. No surprise there. Also, in IDEs it will be a pain to have different sets of adapters on the build path -- would need to do something like have a separate Eclipse project per adapter. This has to be done anyway as there need to be separate artifacts for each cache spi implementation. Its not practical to have this segemented based on java packages alone in a monolithic project. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3983519#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...