The suggestion to only have the proxy implement EJBObject if the Remote interface extends
it is the only one that makes any sense. As I've said, if they want EJB2.1 clients
they already have to create a home interface so it's not an inconvenience. And we can
work through whatever TCK problems that may arise. I second the motion.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4090765#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...