"alesj" wrote : "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | | Please, either read the spec, read the code, read the tests or "suck it and see". | | | | Don't keep expecting me to explain the finest points of every implementation detail | | ad infinitum in the forums (unless you want to post in the user forums | | where I can ignore you :-). | | | Hey, you started suggesting how to do it. | Hence I need/want/like to know the details of what you meant. :-) | | Also, afaik I had a working impl + already suggested you throw in a 'suck it and see' principle. ;-) | It was you that started talking about people having to implement hooks for a simple feature like ignore case. I naturally assumed you didn't understand how it works or the idea that is supposed to be declaritive (annotation based). If you don't like the EnumValueAdapter (which is an implementation detail) then you can replace it with your own adapter already (possibly extending the original). There's a seperate annotation for that. (There's no need to write hooks for hooks. Not very "cool" at all. :-) This was confirmed to me when you kept asking questions instead of trying to understand how it really worked. Claiming to have a working implementation of a new feature when you're not showing and understanding of how the old stuff works is obviously a "red flag". Problems: 1) Why should we let you modify something you don't understand? 2) Why should we continue to answer questions when you haven't tried to understand it for yourself? "Because it SEEMS to work for me" isn't an answer. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4137411#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...