Jason Greene [
http://community.jboss.org/people/jason.greene%40jboss.com] replied to the
discussion
"domain.xml work"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/535965#535965
--------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Stark wrote:
I'm thinking that the profileservice ManagedComponent api is no longer relevant for
our discussion. The fact that we introduced an indirection layer to allow for a stable
metadata is only one part of what is needed. We need a well defined domain model that
describes what the supported administration capabilities are for a given release. Now
I'm thinking that the domain.xml is all that matters. Until a feature of the server
has a representation in the domain.xml model, its not properly managable.
I totally agree. We should focus on the requirements, use-cases and the
model/configuration itself. I also agree that something has to be in domain.xml for it to
be truly managable. I kind of saw runtime management of components not in domain.xml as
more of a stop-gap. However, it probably is easier to just focus on the domain model, and
look at the non-classified runtime stuff later, if it is even relevant anymore.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/535965#535965]
Start a new discussion in Management Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]