"tfennelly" wrote : I wonder would it be possible to generalize the interface more? I'm thinking of a situation where the mapping for a particular adapter may need to perform other mappings outside the set layed down here. | | If we could also extract the provider/listener config into a Map ala the activation config being mapped too, we could then do something like. I thought of that but we already have another mechanism for the 4.4/trunk to specify other activation properties. The purpose of this is just to map our overrides so I would be happier limiting the mapping to this. Handling the 4.4/trunk extension within 4.2 is another issue, which I think is what you may be trying to address. Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4226468#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...