"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : What about MutableSchemaResolver as a name? No problem. anonymous wrote : Anyway, the JBossXBDeployerHelper looks like it should be maintained in JBossXB anyway? I don't mind maintaining a helper class. Of course, deployer-specific bits should still be in the deployers project. If you or Ales want to refactor JBossXBDeployerHelper and extract a helper for the XB, I'll maintain it. anonymous wrote : I guess the main reason why it is not, is because its providing some "VFS integration". | Maybe this could be more simply done by having a VFSInputSource? That's an idea. Which project would it be in? Common? XB does not depend on VFS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215282#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...