"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : Just add support for an annotation. | There's no reason to force people to program in xml. | I'll add them both - xml is OOTB. The annotation will be part of whole annotation handling impl. "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | All of the stuff that can be done with XML, should be doable with annotations. | In principle, all that should be in the xml is a list of beans | with the xml just used to override the annotations or when the bean is not annotated. I agree. Did we ever considered similar scanning for 'MC beans' as it exists for EJB3 and Seam? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064571#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...