"kukeltje" wrote : Shoot me.... | | I've been struggeling with this the whole afternoon and now I was about to give up, it 'works'. Still, I have this funny feeling. Am I correct that we on purpose not use the facelets viewhandler, but do use facelets? Is there a specific reason for this and doesn't limit certain facelets functionality? Yes, this is on purpose. We use a chained view handler. First in the chain is JbpmViewHandler, then the ajax4jsf view handler, and finally the standard Facelets view handler. The chaining is performed automatically by ajax4jsf. There is a context parameter that defines the chaining order. "kukeltje" wrote : What I mean is what is the advantage over the version about a month ago where .xhtml files were addressed? I'm confused and others might be as well. Basically, I need to put in a security constraint so that getting an .xhtml file results in an error. All the xhtml pages are served via facelets as .jsf action URLs. "kukeltje" wrote : Btw, I'm impressed by all the work that went into the webapp and the progress that has been made, so no negative word about that. Thanks. :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3986991#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...