Stefano Maestri [http://community.jboss.org/people/maeste] created the discussion "Re: Testsuite -refactoring to make test easier to run" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/573331#573331 -------------------------------------------------------------- About this refactoring, I think we should also verify AS6 test suite and port all tests (or verify the already done porting in most cases) refactoring them to use embedded/arquillian approach. best regards S. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/573331#573331] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]

Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion "Re: Testsuite -refactoring to make test easier to run" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/573392#573392 -------------------------------------------------------------- What do you mean by this ? There is an example of using Arquillian in our test suite already (./embedded/src/test/java/org/jboss/jca/embedded/unit/ArquillianTestCase.java). More advanced ways of using Arquillian have been filed against Arquillian -- Aslak promised me that those would be in the Beta release. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/573392#573392] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]

Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion "Re: Testsuite -refactoring to make test easier to run" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/573413#573413 -------------------------------------------------------------- The official Arquillian integration are meant for our end-users which will load the container configuration through the embedded container itself. That being said there may be a need to extend this integration in our test suite in order to specify overrides - such as the configuration location and so on. This is however specific to the test suite itself and won't be shipped in the distribution. If you have requirements just posts them - this will end up in ironjacamar-embedded-arquillian-testsuite.jar. Say what ?!? Arquillian deployments are done using ShrinkWrap. What do you mean ? -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/573413#573413] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]

Jesper Pedersen [http://community.jboss.org/people/jesper.pedersen] created the discussion "Re: Testsuite -refactoring to make test easier to run" To view the discussion, visit: http://community.jboss.org/message/573465#573465 -------------------------------------------------------------- EmbeddedJCA embedded = new EmbeddedJCA(false);   // For all configuration files embedded.deploy(myConfigurationFile); to override the configuration used by the container, correct ? That is why we need a test suite extension of the embedded container -- to externalize the configuration paths. Yes, the default setup should allow just to use the container/configuration on the class path. -------------------------------------------------------------- Reply to this message by going to Community [http://community.jboss.org/message/573465#573465] Start a new discussion in IronJacamar Development at Community [http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]