"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : | I don't like it refactored or otherwise because it is wrong. | | There are two different issues: | | 1) Which codesource should it use? | | i.e. should it use the top level file: url like JBoss4 or a vfs url as the codesource | This is what you CodeSourceGenerator abstraction is trying to do, but it is a hack | and it also only applied to the vfs classloading spi? | I say it is a hack because it is not the job of the classloader to map vfs urls to other urls. We should be asking to the VFS subsystem to do this. This kind of negates the need for the CodeSourceGenerator abstraction altogether with the only question being a policy of which url you use as the code source. (The permissions should be the same regardless of how you identify the code). View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4188112#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...