org.jboss.ejb3:jboss-ejb3 is good as an overall name.
The aim of the game is not to get an unified assembly, but to get a diverse set of
components which can form different assemblies. For example EJB 3 + Remoting 3, EJB 3 +
QOS Cache, or just EJB 3 lite. Thus satisfying more use cases with less code bases.
The unique namespace is something we should strive for nevertheless.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4206394#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...