JBoss development,
A new message was posted in the thread "VFS3 and symlinks":
http://community.jboss.org/message/528555#528555
Author : Ales Justin
Profile :
http://community.jboss.org/people/alesj
Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Just want to say that if this is the correct fix, it should not be
optional.
I don't see any other way of fixing this -- force all paths to be canonical.
But I would expect that this call is not cheap, asking the underlying FS for canonical
path.
And since 99% of users are not using symlinks (at least that's what I would expect),
making this force optional makes sense.
No point in allowing configurations which aren't valid.
I don't get this.
Unfortunately I think the problem is even bigger than just VFS::getChild.
My guess is that even calls to VirtualFile::getChild are due to fail with symlinked path?
--------------------------------------------------------------
To reply to this message visit the message page:
http://community.jboss.org/message/528555#528555