"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "kabir.khan(a)jboss.com" wrote : | | Are you saying "don't use it", or "use it and we'll retrofit an SPI"? :-) As far as I can tell I will need information from the ClassLoaderPolicy. | | I'm saying any use of the classloading metadata for the AOP domain construction | would be a hack until we have a real solution based on metadata context | rather than the classloader of the aspectized class/aspect class/joinpoint. | | The latter (classloader solution) is just a temporary solution to reproduce | what jboss4 does. I don't think we need to create a SPI (which we will need to | support forever) for something that is a temporary hack. | | If we created a SPI, it wouldn't be the Unified ClassLoader or the new classloader | it would have to cover all possible classloading models that people might want | to plugin to the deployers. I am thinking about if we need to create special classpools understanding the new loaders. Let's ignore this for now until I am sure that these pools will be needed View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086258#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...