"beve" wrote : This is to support pass-through of JMS properties. Previously we just passed through all properties which caused problems with some JMS Providers. But should this not be the responsibility of the gateway and EPR to handle? "beve" wrote : The issue we had was when working with IBMQ in combination with JBossMQ. JBossMQ throws an exception if a provider specific jms property, one starting with "JMS_verndor_name" was not recognized as it's own. This was seen with a single provider, oracle, we were not passing these between different providers. "beve" wrote : Well this might make our life easier but perhaps this could hurt performance. These properties could be optimization properties that the provider can take advantage of. Okay, so it sounds like we need a more flexible solution. Do you have any examples of the properties which you are allowed to set? Kev View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4230851#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...