"david.lloyd(a)jboss.com" wrote : "falazar" wrote : It seems like a couple of these tables may not be normalized very well either. | I'm with you there, but from talking to Tom I don't think we can expect this to change in the 3.x series, since we're going to avoid any sweeping database changes, especially those that would introduce compatibility problems... Tom, correct me if I'm wrong. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, ... can have changing database schemas. it's for micro release numbers that jbpm db schema should be stable (e.g. between 3.1.2 and 3.1.3). but id didn't yet get completely the problem that falazar is experiencing. falazar, can you try explaining again what you did, what jbpm behaviour was and what behaviour you expected. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3974990#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...