"trustin" wrote : I agree with you that it's of dubious value to provide additional transports considering the current set of implemented transports. | | BTW, it sounds like Remoting is not for interoperability between various parties but for efficient and full-featured communication between only Remoting clients and servers. Did I understand correctly? You are correct. "trustin" wrote : and out of curiosity, is it what users want? Well, we've had a tough time getting user input thus far. Hopefully next week will shed some light. The current state of Remoting 3 is based on all the feedback I've been able to locate about earlier versions thus far. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4086390#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...