"ron.sigal(a)jboss.com" wrote : If it's intended to be generally extensible,
then isn't "ejb3" in the package names misleading? How about
"invokable" in place of "ejb3"?
Yep, I started building it in EJB3, then committed into repos/common. So either I'll
refactor it, or if someone else beats me to it feel free.
S,
ALR
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4267380#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...