&quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | NOW FOR THE QUESTIONS. | First, does module name equate to the osgi bundle symbolic name? We would also need additional policy information that equates to the Require-Bundle header parameters. &quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | 1) Is the above "Note" about mutual exclusion of exportAll and listing | capabilities correct? If not, it could get very messy trying to merge them. ;-) | I guess, I can't see why one would want to use both syntaxes. &quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | 2) In the filter case, the packages automatically get the version of the module, | but this doesn't happen for listing capabilities explicitly | | | | <classloading xmlns="urn:jboss:classloading:1.0"> | | <capabilities> | | <module name="export1" version="1.0.0"/> | | <package name="export2"/> | | | The package export2 has version 0.0.0 if you are explicit. | Sure, this would be a reason to use the expanded syntax. &quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | 4) Should I create an included export filter? | This would mean all classes are in the classloader, but only | the listed packages are exported. | While this might seem obvious, it is effectively the same as listing the | packages in the capabilities and therefore redundant. | It would also mean that "exportAll" doesn't really have that meaning anymore, | instead a better name would be something like "autoDiscoverPackages". :-) | I don't see the difference between this and the export-all="ALL" included="..." notion. What is the difference? &quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | a) Do you think we should "fixup" the capabilities, i.e. | missing module capabilities, missing package versions | or should we just do what the user says? | What would the version be fixed up to? In terms of modules, unless its mapped to something usable like the deployment name, how would the fixed up name be usable? &quot;adrian(a)jboss.org&quot; wrote : | b) Is it worth trying to go through the "hard problem" of merging | the simple but not very explicit exportAll processing with explicit capabilities? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4130216#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...