"mark.little(a)jboss.com" wrote : But whatever happy medium you guys come up with, just make sure it's documented and in place yesterday ;-) hehehe I'm cool with whatever people find easiest to use - that's my goal (plus validation etc of course). I just think that the point at which we have it now is a good balance between having it humanly understandable and manageable, yet normalised enough to eliminate most problems caused by duplication. Of course, we can't tell until we get feedback from a broader range of people - I'm the only one that's really played with the current model while Kurt came up with the original - as the saying goes, "2 points don't make a curve". I personally would like to get some user feedback before bringing it any further. If then, we get a clear message asking for more normalisation, I'd be more than happy. Before we decided to make yesterdays forum post, this is actually what Kurt, Dave and I had agreed. I personally think that the extra normalisation is something that's easier to add than take away. Also, whatever option we take, do we really think we'll never have to come back to this again i.e. we're going to get it right first time? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3993786#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...