"alesj" wrote :
| "adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote :
| | I said this before WRT to the horrible explicit VFS Cache you did, but I was
ignored.
| |
| Where was this?
| I never (or I must really missed it) heard any idea/feedback about vfs cache.
| When things were horribly slow, I thought of something.
| And even then there was no feedback.
|
| Good, bad, horrible ... whatever ... it still only has a few lines to change if you
wanna ditch that.
|
It was on some thread where you described the VFS cache api.
I don't want you to ditch it, I just want it to be used transparently within the VFS.
The programmers that write VFS code shouldn't have to be aware of the caching
and code in a different way to get it. It should be configurable in an
"aspectized" way.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4205601#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...