David Ward [
http://community.jboss.org/people/dward] replied to the discussion
"SOAPProxy initialization and deployment ordering"
To view the discussion, visit:
http://community.jboss.org/message/541594#541594
--------------------------------------------------------------
Brad Davis wrote:
> Yes, this is deliberate at present because we publish the derived WSDL and validate
the configuration at that point. As mentioned earlier in the week though, this is easy to
work around by using a local copy of the WSDL and will give you the behaviour you
require.
I am saying if this is deliberate, we should fix it because it is a design flaw. That is
why I opened the support ticket.
I'm sorry, I can't resist responding. How
is this a design flaw? If we went with a lazy approach, then we would have a deployed
service for which we would +not+ be able to expose WSDL for! We need to pull in the WSDL
on initialization so we can transform it and provide it to consumers of the ESB. If we
went the lazy way, we would get +more+ bug reports from people saying "WSDL contract
unavailable!"
--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to this message by going to Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/message/541594#541594]
Start a new discussion in JBoss ESB Development at Community
[
http://community.jboss.org/choose-container!input.jspa?contentType=1&...]