"adrian(a)jboss.org" wrote : "wolfc" wrote : | | Code with an explicit check on null is twice as fast. So I would save 1ms for every ~100000 calls. :-) | | | If only the new for() loop checked for null and didn't iterate instead of throwing an NPE. ;-) Yes, the enhanced for loop should have been checking for nulls. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105055#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...