I like to discuss the project naming conventions a bit more, and hopefully settle on something. Steve Ebersole brought up a couple of things including: Should we separate commercial-only from open projects with org and com? So for example we would have a standard groupId of: org.jboss.${project-name} for open source products, and commercial projects (JBoss ON?) would have com.jboss.${project-name} This naming scheme would follow the maven recommendations: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html Artifact IDs could be jboss-${project}-${subproject} to make sure that we don't have any naming conflicts. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4043303#... Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...