Re: [jbosscache-dev] Naming 2.2.0 and 3.0.0
I definitely need a 2.2 before a 3.0 (array interception), and I need it
to be possible to include it in EAP5
Manik Surtani wrote:
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
>> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>> Poblano and Naga? :-)
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik(a)jboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Lead, AS Clustering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat