JDBCCacheLoader? Was: [jbosscache-dev] Re: JDBCClassLoader bug
So without the root element you're not going to be able to persist
any data stored directly in the root node (if anyone ever does this!)
Is the new impl in any way compatible with the existing
JDBCCacheLoader anyway? I thought their storage formats were different.
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Email: manik(a)jboss.org
Telephone: +44 7786 702 706
MSN: manik(a)surtani.org
Yahoo/AIM/Skype: maniksurtani
On 1 Feb 2007, at 03:49, Mircea Markus wrote:
In order to make new implementation 'backward' compatible
(i.e. to
work on existing data managed by JDBCacheLoader) I need root to be
persisted - implementation heavily relies on that.
My thought is to check at startup whether it exists, and create it.
Any cons/alternatives?
Cheers,
Mircea
On 2/1/07, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
loader.put(any_fqn);
assertTrue(loader.exists(Fqn.ROOT)); //fails
The problem is that root element is not persisted.
Cheers,
Mircea
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.5 KB)