Brian Stansberry wrote:
> However, this sounds like a problem with PFER. If someone calls
PFER,
> I think the original transaction should resync the node snapshot.
How would this be done? AFAIK the application has no control over the
data in JBCs transaction context.
The PFER implementation, not the application, would just drop the node
from the tx context which invoked pfer. That would mean that any
subsequent read would fetch the most current data.
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat