1:25 p.m.
Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of upcoming
JBC releases. :-)
Thoughts and opinions, people?
Poblano and Naga? :-)
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
1:37 p.m.
Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
Manik Surtani wrote:
Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
upcoming
JBC releases. :-)
Thoughts and opinions, people?
Poblano and Naga? :-)
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
5:41 p.m.
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
Manik Surtani wrote:
> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
> Thoughts and opinions, people?
> Poblano and Naga? :-)
> --
> Manik Surtani
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> manik(a)jboss.org
> _______________________________________________
> jbosscache-dev mailing list
> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
6:19 p.m.
I was kidding. :) Although the pepper shortage is becoming a serious issue.
I'll need a 2.1.1 due to timing but seems more whether you want a 2.2 is
really whether you want to get some stuff out to the community before
you start a long push on 3.0. I wouldn't make somehow getting 2.2 stuff
into the AS a significant factor in your decision, as I think the odds
aren't that high it will happen.
Manik Surtani wrote:
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
>> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>> Poblano and Naga? :-)
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik(a)jboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Lead, AS Clustering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
--
Brian Stansberry
Lead, AS Clustering
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
4:03 p.m.
I definitely need a 2.2 before a 3.0 (array interception), and I need it
to be possible to include it in EAP5
Manik Surtani wrote:
What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
>> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>> Poblano and Naga? :-)
>> --
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> manik(a)jboss.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbosscache-dev mailing list
>> jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
>
> --
> Brian Stansberry
> Lead, AS Clustering
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
_______________________________________________
jbosscache-dev mailing list
jbosscache-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosscache-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
3:07 p.m.
On 21 Mar 2008, at 21:03, Jason T. Greene wrote:
I definitely need a 2.2 before a 3.0 (array interception), and I
need it to be possible to include it in EAP5
Hmm, I thought EAP 5 will be shipped with whatever release goes into
AS 5, micro release updates being allowed?
Manik Surtani wrote:
> What do you reckon then, straight on to 3.0.0, and a 2.1.1 for bug
> fixes, etc. on 2.1.0?
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 18:37, Brian Stansberry wrote:
>> Good argument for no 2.2!! We're running out of peppers. ;)
>>
>> Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> Alright, that time has come again for some creative naming of
>>> upcoming JBC releases. :-)
>>> Thoughts and opinions, people?
>>> Poblano and Naga? :-)
And in the face of a lack of any further comment on the names, I'm
gonna call 2.2 Poblano and 3.0 Naga! :-)
Cheers,
--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
manik(a)jboss.org
6085
days inactive
6091
days old
jbosscache-dev@lists.jboss.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Brian Stansberry -
Jason T. Greene -
Manik Surtani