Re: [rules-users] Using "matches" in Guided Rule Editor (BRL)

Dear all, I have a problem when using the operator "matches" in the Guided Rule Editor. I can use the operator from the drop down list, but when saving the rule, the tabs "BRL Source" and "Generated DRL" show me that the operator has not been used at all. Instead, the "operator" tag is left out completely in the BRL source. If I choose a different operator, e.g. "is equal to", save, and switch back to "matches" (and save again), than the BRL source still shows the operator "==". If I however edit the BRL source itself to contain "matches", the rule works fine in my application. Strange enough, if I use "and matches" in a multi-part-condition on one attribute, there does not seem to be this problem (the BRL says "&& matches"). It seems to be only a problem if the "matches" operator comes in the first assertion line for an attribute. I would be really grateful if anyone had an idea on this behaviour, since I seem to be quite lost! Thanks in advance, Andrea -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Using-%22matches%22-in-Guided-Rule-Editor-%28BRL%29... Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users