Huh.
Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :)
I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces
for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that
the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that.
WDYT?
--Lincoln
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com>wrote:
For example the Servlet stuff from
http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are apparently
leading ;-)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other
> modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>>> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :)
>>>
>>>
>>> That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;)
>>>
>>> -Dan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Allen
>>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>>
>>>
http://mojavelinux.com
>>>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Nik
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
>
http://ocpsoft.com
>
http://scrumshark.com
> "Keep it Simple"
>
--
---
Nik