Except releases would then no longer be 100% reproducible. Probably comes
down to a matter of policy.
-Jordan
On Jan 28, 2011 6:33 PM, "Brian Leathem" <bleathem(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Good idea!
Or something like either:
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.0.1)</version>
or
<version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.1)</version>
That way breaking changes if bound to a version increment, would then
require modules to re-release.
Brian
On 01/28/2011 03:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> Have we considered using version range specifiers via the maven
> artifact syntax?
>
> If modules used something like:
>
> <version>[3.0.0.Beta2,)</version>
>
> It would allow more flexibility as we go along / upgrade individual
> modules. This way we wouldn't need to re-release *everything* when we
> re-release *one* thing. WDYT? I'm sure there are consequences, but
> others may have ideas too.
>
> ~Lincoln
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev