Re: [seam-dev] First cab off the rank!

That makes sense. I don't know what I was thinking as you couldn't have a JDK proxy extend AnnotationLiteral anyway.  I will look at redoing mine using JDK proxies to remove the javassist dependency. Stuart ________________________________________ From: Gavin King [gavin.king(a)gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 11:58 AM To: Stuart Douglas Cc: seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: Re: [seam-dev] First cab off the rank! By "all the interfaces", I mean both interfaces. On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Gavin King <gavin.king(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Right but Annotation and every annotation type are all interfaces. You > would not be able to extend AnnotationLiteral, but you don't really > need that. All you need is to be able to implement all the interfaces. > > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Stuart Douglas > <stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au&gt; wrote: >> I don't think that this would be possible as the jdk proxy only allows you to implement SomeInterface, not SomeInterface<Foo> (i.e. there is no mechanism for generating a signature attribute in the proxy). When weld tries to get this information a GenericSignatureFormatError would result (I saw this in my code before I added the SignitureAttribute ). I may be wrong on this, but I can't see any way around it. >> >> Stuart >> ________________________________________ >> From: seam-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [seam-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Gavin King [gavin.king(a)gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 5:32 AM >> To: Shane Bryzak >> Cc: seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] First cab off the rank! >> >> You used a jdk dynamicproxy? Probably a better idea. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Nov 29, 2009, at 1:01 PM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Done, although I didn't need to use Javassist. ;) >>> >>> On 30/11/09 02:38, Gavin King wrote: >>>> Stuart has some code to do this using javassist. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Shane Bryzak&lt;sbryzak(a)redhat.com&gt; >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Almost got this working, however I need to be able to reflectively >>>>> create an >>>>> AnnotationLiteral, given a String containing the fully qualified >>>>> name of the >>>>> qualifier.  Anyone done this before? >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> > > > > -- > Gavin King > gavin.king(a)gmail.com > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin > http://hibernate.org > http://seamframework.org > -- Gavin King gavin.king(a)gmail.com http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin http://hibernate.org http://seamframework.org