that we are apparently
leading ;-)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that
other
modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com>wrote:
> Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES?
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <
>> lincolnbaxter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :)
>>
>>
>> That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;)
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>>
http://mojavelinux.com
>>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Nik
>
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"