So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion (which
was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of stuff), and we
should go back to numbering them with the GA qualifier.
Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in there?
Do we have to redo the release?
On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote:
Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA
qualifier. So, should we add it back in?
On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik.
>
> /max
>
> Pete Muir wrote:
>> :-)
>>
>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page,
>> we'll be sure to follow it!
>>
>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote:
>>
>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent.
>>>
>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi.
>>>
>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical
>>> names.
>>>
>>> /max
>>>
>>> Pete Muir wrote:
>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem
>>>> you describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and
>>>> recommend this to people using our poms) so it should be ok...
>>>>
>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard?
>>>>
>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the
>>>>> maven resolution mechanism was retarded.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no
>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still
>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards"
<orb(a)nostacktrace.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It's out. I'm still waiting on IT to updated the
latest/
>>>>>>>> latest-2/
>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process
>>>>>>>> should be
>>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of
>>>>>>> the 2.1.2 release in maven:
>>>>>>>
http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than
'2.1.2'?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Congrats on the release!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>>> asgeir
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev