Re: [seam-dev] SAF (aka Entity Framework) idea in Seam 3

That's good at the runtime, but develop time that really doesn't help because it won't compile and you won't get IDE auto complete. On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 16:10, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Stuart, > > You also previous mentioned... > > With portable extensions we could do something like: > > > @Entity > @AutoHome > public class MyEntity .... > > > and have a portable extension that registers a new home bean for every > entity with the @AutoHome annotation. > > I think we all agree that "Home" is a crappy name, so perhaps @Crud or > @Dao would be a sufficient name. > > -Dan > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:15, Stuart Douglas <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > >> ** >> My original plan for EntityQuery was to use the ServiceHandler stuff in >> solder: >> >> @EntityQuery >> public interface MyQuery { >> >> @Query("Select u from User u where type=:p1") >> public List<User> users(String type); >> >> } >> >> Stuart >> >> >> On 09/21/2011 06:00 AM, José Rodolfo Freitas wrote: >> >> Yeah, I agree that being declarative is the ideal. >> let's say no to inheritance with generics! hehehe. >> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:36, José Rodolfo Freitas < >>> joserodolfo.freitas(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>> >>>> What I like most in CDI and Seam3 is that it's very easy to keep things >>>> simple and that's something I strongly advocate. >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>>> Of course there're still boilerplate code, but I think it's minimal >>>> (compared to the JEE generations before), and that's something forge can >>>> create without the need to satisfy a "framework". Yes, I admitedly am afraid >>>> of that word. >>>> >>> >>> That's fine, it doesn't have to be a framework. I do think there is >>> room for having some common scaffolding, though. If we can do that by >>> extending the programming model (annotations, generic beans or interfaces) >>> so that it's declarative, that's probably ideal. >>> >>> I suggest that we brainstorm proposals using gists ( >>> http://gist.github.com). That will get the ball rolling. We can start >>> with the idea Jason posted, or feel free to take a different approach. >>> >>> -Dan >>> >>> -- >>> Dan Allen >>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action >>> Registered Linux User #231597 >>> >>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about >>> http://mojavelinux.com >>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> >> >> > > > -- > Dan Allen > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action > Registered Linux User #231597 > > http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about > http://mojavelinux.com > http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction > > > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu