Re: [seam-dev] laying the tracks for Seam 3
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:17, Jay Balunas wrote:
faces (which would have page actions, faces messages, and perhaps engulf
>> the current ui too)
>>
>
> Sounds good. We should impl page actions on top of JSF2 events I think.
> FacesMessages aren't needed as they are now stored in the flashscope by
> default.
>
> Pete - We had talked about having the ui component being separate from
> seam core and not depend on it. This would allow application to who are not
> using seam to take advantage of the ui component. This came up a while back
> in a discussion about the RichFaces validation components and moving them to
> seam-ui.
>
> Would this current approach satisfy that?
>
Yes. As I keep saying "there is no Seam core" in Seam 3 - all modules will
*just* depend on any JSR-299 impl :-) But you are actually asking "Can the
faces module degrade gracefully such that what can be used in a plain JSF2
environment - no 299 - works" I think?
I misspoke regarding seam-core :-(
I really mean depending on any other seam classes in other modules (
including 299). If we are going to migrate some RichFaces components to
seam-ui. I just want to make sure we don't end up requiring users to
include X # of seam modules, and/or 299.
iirc - I think we were discussing some of the bean validation code. We
should discuss other components as well.
--
blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.5 KB)