Correct, I'll be working with James to incorporate any changes we may need
into tools once I know what they are.
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-----Original message-----
From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)bleepbleep.org.uk>
To: Ken Finnigan <ken(a)kenfinnigan.me>
Cc: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com>, seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wed, Jan 19, 2011 13:28:03 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Seam 3 Beta this week!
I assume this reuse extends to the tools built for JBoss logging to do built
time generation of logging impl?
On 19 Jan 2011, at 13:16, Ken Finnigan wrote:
For some context on the reasons for bringing jboss-logging into
solder,
please take a look at
http://seamframework.org/Seam3/JBossLoggingIntegration
for full details.
In a nutshell it's to enable us to remove the dependency on jboss-logging,
while enabling us some flexibility in terms of creating our own annotations,
that don't clash with jboss-logging and cause confusion. The reason being
that the annotations within jboss-logging were never intended for developer
consumption, they are intended for use within the JBoss AS container. For
this reason the port into solder removes those annotations from
jboss-logging, and moves them to a solder package where appropriate.
Feel free to amend the wiki page if there are other items that you feel
are of
merit.
Thanks
Ken
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ken Finnigan <ken(a)kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
Here's the link to the incorporation of jboss-logging into solder:
https://github.com/kenfinnigan/solder/tree/jboss-logging
Appreciate any comments/feedback as still new at this.
If it's easier for it to be a pull request just let me know.
There will undoubtedly be a few additions to this once I work out how i18n
module
will look at the best location for some of these changes, solder or
i18n.
Thanks
Ken
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As a team we need to review Ken's improvements and provide feedback
because
it's a critical piece of Seam, not to mention it's importance to the
i18n API.
Ken, it would be best to post the branch where the changes live (sorry if
I'm
a step behind if you already have).
- Dan Allen
Sent from my Android-powered phone:
An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers
On Jan 18, 2011 3:30 PM, "Ken Finnigan" <ken(a)kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:49, Jason Porter
<lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I need a Solder release (I'm working on switching to beans.xml), then
>>> I can release the alpha, and a beta quickly for Catch, or we could
>>> still keep it at alpha. Though because it's such an integrated piece
>>> ideally it should be beta.
>>>
>>> I think we should all be using the next release of solder if we can
>>> make sure it works on Glassfish 3.0.1. I'll send a follow-up email
>>> with my latest exception.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Also, please use seam-parent 7 and seam-bom 3.0.0.b06...but stay tuned,
I
>> may update to seam-parent 8 to pull in the Weld
1.1.0.Final.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>>
http://mojavelinux.com
>>
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>>
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>>
> +1 to Solder release, especially after some logging/i18n changes have
been
> incorporated from some work I've done with Dan.
>
> In terms of i18n, there are a couple of things I would like to get done
for
> the first Beta, as it will likely change the API, that rely on
the
Solder
> changes. Not sure whether I will be able to get them all
complete by
> Wed/Thu, though will see how I go tonight.
>
> Ken
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev