Steve/Ramesh,
What are your thoughts on how we should distribute the SOAP/REST access documentation?
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Hawkins <shawkins(a)redhat.com>
To: Ramesh Reddy <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
Cc: teiid-dev <teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:30:13 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] Teiid 6.2 MS2
Teiid 6.2 still has the xml processing code, but no SOAP war. So we should still consider
documentation related to soap/rest access as part of this release. They don't need to
be considered blockers though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
To: "Steven Hawkins" <shawkins(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "teiid-dev" <teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:14:29 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [teiid-dev] Teiid 6.2 MS2
I am OK with moving those enhancements to 6.3.
What is status on the XML documentation JIRAs? Since Teiid still has the
XML processing code in 6.2, can we move this to 6.3? I know there is
been some documentation on this but does it cover all these JIRAs.
Apart from these there are only few connector specific defects, that
need input on.
Ramesh..
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:49 -0400, Steven Hawkins wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to get consensus on an M2 release soon (tonight possibly). For M2 all major
enhancements should be finished and only targeted enhancements and defects should be
worked for RC1. Any remaining major enhancements (TEIID-245 runtime costing update,
TEIID-99 multisource procedure handling, and TEIID-669 pass through commands) would be
rolled into 6.3. As with the previous releases, we will branch soon after RC1 to work
only Designer integration issues.
Any thoughts?
Steve
_______________________________________________
teiid-dev mailing list
teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
_______________________________________________
teiid-dev mailing list
teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev