Re: [teiid-dev] [teiid-designer-dev] Materialized Views
----- "Barry Lafond" <blafond(a)redhat.com> wrote:
All,
......
That all said, would it be wrong to NOT treat these Materialization
Physical models as dependencies? Users would be totally responsible for including them in
a VDB containing the original virtual models?
Comments, ideas?
While it certainly would be best to add them automatically like we do for other models,
would it be possibly to flag a missing Materialization Physical model as a validation
error on a VDB without changing the metamodel? Would that be good enough?
Barry
_______________________________________________ teiid-designer-dev mailing list
teiid-designer-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-designer-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.1 KB)