Re: [teiid-dev] UDF Related Changes in 7.0 Teiid
On Mar 10, 2010, at 12:57 PM, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
The "path" will *not* be required.
If we make this required, then we need to push this on all the models
including the dynamic vdb models that have have no path for their
models. Also, there is support of UDF in the Dynamic VDBs.
Sorry, I was forgetting that you can now have models that have no corresponding artifact
within the VDB. So, what I'm really getting at is we shouldn't have any default
behavior that assumes an XMI extension on a file when a path is specified; we'll
always provide the extension.
Thanks,
JPAV