Re: [teiid-dev] Defining Data Roles
Ramesh Reddy wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 14:37 -0500, Ted Jones wrote:
> So the roles would be defined in the Designer and the users would be created and
assigned to the roles in JON?
>
> If so, that seems like a reasonable approach.
>
>
No, the role references will be created in the Designer, and those
references will be mapped to actual roles in the JON/JOPR. In the
absence of this mapping, runtime will try to use the reference name as
actual name. This will help us through testing at design time with out
use of another tool to configure these details.
It might be useful for this to be configurable behavior. In dev,
perhaps you want to run without security and no-mapping scenarios should
be ignored or defaulted. In test/prod, you may want an error if a role
reference is not explicitly mapped.
Creation of a user or creation of role is not the functionality of
this
module, those should be handled by who ever handles security domains.
Currently I do not see this in the JOPR tool, that is something we need
to open a dialog with JOPR team and see where this is on their roadmap.
The question is who "owns" the group-role and role->reference
mapping
information, from both a UI and persistence perspective.
Ramesh..
_______________________________________________
teiid-dev mailing list
teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev
--
Ken Johnson
Sr. Product Manager
JBoss Middleware Business Unit
Red Hat, Inc
978.392.3917
ken.johnson(a)redhat.com