I don't see how it would help even if it worked with the interceptor for the CollectionOverridePropertyUnitTestCase.
For the DuplicateInterceptorUnitTestCase, I agree, it's useful to be able to define interceptors/metadata per use of a binding, not only its global definition.
And I don't agree with Scott's "fix" to ignore addition of a duplicate interceptor. The client code should be fixed in this case.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3991928#3991928
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3991928